SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1311

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC – Appellant
Versus
SHIVA DISTILLERIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY SAHNI, C.M.LAL, GAURAV BHATIA, SHIKHA SACHDEV

BADAR DURREZ, J, J.


( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of IA 1717/2004 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiffs have the filed the suit for permanent and mandatory injunction, passing off, infringement of trade mark, rendition of accounts, delivery up, damages and for unfair competition. The plaintiff no. 1 (Diageo North America Inc) is a corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, USA. The plaintiff no. 2 (UDV India Ltd) is an Indian company and has been licensed by plaintiff no. 1 to use various brands and trade marks, one of which is the trade mark SMIRNOFF which is in question in the present proceedings.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs claim to be the registered proprietors of the trade mark smirnoff label under reg. no. 189744 dated 31. 03. 1959; the PIERRE SMIRNOFF label under reg. no. 202251 dated 04. 05. 1961; the SMIRNOFF mark with eyebrow device under reg. no. 904318 dated 17. 02. 2000. It is stated by the plaintiffs that while SMIRNOFF is disclaimed in the first registration there is no disclaimer in the other two. In particular, reg. no. 904318 " SMIRNOFF with eyebrow device " according to the plaintiff
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top