SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1388

MANMOHAN SARIN, S.L.BHAYANA
PARVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN BHARDWAJ, ZUBEDA BEGUM

S. L. BHAYANA, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER has assailed the order and judgment dated 26. 07. 2005 in o. A. No 2320/04 and order dated 01. 08. 2006 in RA NO. 207/2005 in the above- mentioned O. A. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, new Delh. He has further sought quashing and setting aside of orders of the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority passed against him. Through this writ petition, the petitioner has further prayed for reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits including pay, salary, seniority, increments, promotions etc.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioner joined the Delhi Police as Constable in the year 1998. He claims to have served the department with sincerity and to the utmost satisfaction of his superiors. However, on 5. 9. 2003, he was arrested for alleged involvement in several criminal cases. FIRs in various police stations were registered against him. He was booked under various provisions of IPC and Arms Act. In one of the cases filed under section 395 of IPC lodged under FIR No. 171 of 2003, PS daurala, UP, he was released by CJM, Merrut vide order dated 15. 3. 2004 on h























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top