MANMOHAN SARIN, S.L.BHAYANA
PARVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITIONER has assailed the order and judgment dated 26. 07. 2005 in o. A. No 2320/04 and order dated 01. 08. 2006 in RA NO. 207/2005 in the above- mentioned O. A. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, new Delh. He has further sought quashing and setting aside of orders of the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority passed against him. Through this writ petition, the petitioner has further prayed for reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits including pay, salary, seniority, increments, promotions etc.
( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioner joined the Delhi Police as Constable in the year 1998. He claims to have served the department with sincerity and to the utmost satisfaction of his superiors. However, on 5. 9. 2003, he was arrested for alleged involvement in several criminal cases. FIRs in various police stations were registered against him. He was booked under various provisions of IPC and Arms Act. In one of the cases filed under section 395 of IPC lodged under FIR No. 171 of 2003, PS daurala, UP, he was released by CJM, Merrut vide order dated 15. 3. 2004 on h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.