SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1863

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
MOHD. RAFIQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT, DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.B.S.Tkokchom, SUNIL K.KAPUR

( 1 ) THIS application under Section 389 Cr. P. C. has been made, for suspension of sentence, by the appellant, who has been convicted under Section 376 read with Section 506 IPC. The appellant was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- by the Trial Court. It is submitted by the counsel for appellant that the appellant was in custody for more than 06 years including remission period. He was granted interim bail twice in July, 2006 and October, 2006 by this Court and he did not misuse the bail.

( 2 ) THE counsel for appellant has relied upon Akhtari Bi (SMT) v. State of MP (2001) 4 SCC 355 , Harbhajan Singh and Ors. v. The State of Punjab 1977 Crl. L. J. 1424 and Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and Ors. v. State of Gujarat (1999) 4 SCC 421 to impress upon the Court that since he had already undergone half of the sentence and there was no likelihood of appeal being heard, his sentence should be suspended.

( 3 ) A perusal of record would show that appellant was convicted for committing a rape of child aged about 06 years and he was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment. A perusal of judgment shows that trial court had considered all the aspects and the judgment was bas







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top