SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2268

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
SANJEEV NAGPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.Dalal, M.K.ARORA, M.P.SINGH

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the FIR No. 16/2003 registered at P. S. Kirti Nagar under sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and the proceedings arising out of the said FIR.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1, Sanjeev Nagpal and respondent no. 2, Sonia Nagpal was solemnized on 19. 8. 96 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Unfortunately, the marriage turned sour and they started living separately since June, 2001. A boy named Shrey was born to the parties.

( 3 ) A complaint dated 7. 1. 2003 was filed by the respondent no. 2 against the petitioner no. 1, his father (petitioner no. 2), mother (petitioner no. 3), sister (petitioner no. 5) and brother-in-law (petitioner no. 4 ). The complaint contained the allegations of harassment for dowry, illegal retention of istridhan etc.

( 4 ) ON the basis of the complaint FIR No. 16/03 dated 9. 1. 2003 was registered.

( 5 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, parties entered into a written agreement dated 20. 1. 03 whereby they settled the disputes between them on the terms and conditions mentioned therein. Inter alia, it was agreed that a sum


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top