S.RAVINDRA BHAT
JOHNSON and JOHNSON LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING AUTHORITY – Respondent
1. The petitioner challenges the legality of two orders dated 20.4.1998 and 01.11.2002 by the first respondent. It also seeks a direction to disclose to it complete and detailed cost data with all relevant break ups and particulars relating to price fixation made on 07.08.1996 and consider and dispose of its application for review in accordance with law after granting it suitable opportunity of hearing.
2. The facts are briefly set out hereafter that the petitioner at the relevant time was manufacturing “Raricap” iron tablets. The product was originally manufactured by one M/s. Ethnor Ltd. It is contended that the said M/s. Ethnor Ltd. had on 24.11.1989, applied to the Central Government, for price approval of the Tablet at Rs. 25.01 per pack. Sometime in 1994, M/s Ethnor Ltd apparently was merged or taken over by the petitioner, which continued to market the product. On 07.08.1996, exercising powers under Para 8 of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (hereafter called “DPCO-95”) the Central Government revised the price of Raricap Tablets, for a pack of 40 and fixed the cost at Rs. 16.24. 3. The petitioner by its letter dated 19.8.1996, claimed that t
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1981) 2 SCR 533 : (1981) 1 SCC 664 : AIR 1981 SC 818
Shivji Nathubhai v. Union of India (1960) 2 SCR 775 : AIR 1960 SC 606
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. v. Union of India 1990 (3) SCC 223
Swadeshi cotton Mills v. Union of India (1981) 2 SCR 533 : (1981) 1 SCC 664 : AIR 1981 SC 818
Union of India and Anr. v. Cynamide India Ltd. and Anr. (1987) 2 SCC 720
Vrajlal Manilal & Co. v. Union of India (1964) 7 SCR 97 : AIR 1964 SC 1643
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.