SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 138

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Liberty Oil Mills – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


12. We may notice here the argument of Shri V. P. Raman that Clause 11 (4) excludes the application of Clause 8-B to goods by Open General Licence. We find no substance in this submission. Clause 8-B expressely provides that action clause may be taken "notwithstanding anything contained in this order". In view of this non obstante clause, we have no doubt that Clause 8-B applies equally to goods covered by Open General Licence.

13. We may mention at this juncture that Clauses 8-A and 8-B were not to be found in the Imports (Control) Order, 1955 originally but were introduced into it later by way of amendment, to make provision for the making of interim orders pending investigation into allegation under Clause 8. The amendment was in consequence of the lacuna being pointed out by the Bombay High Court in some cases which came before it.

14. To be fair to the learned counsel for the petitioner and the other learned counsel for the interveners, all of them were unanimous about the necessity for a provision like Clause 8-B and none of them argued standing find 8-B the standing view no equally that Clause 8-B would be ultra vires if the principle of natural justice could be read into it.















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top