RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
PUSHPA SAROHA – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER KUMAR – Respondent
1. The defendants have challenged the very maintainability owing to the bar of Section 185 of Delhi Land Reforms Act, and which is for consideration.
2. The suit was originally filed by the plaintiff herein along with the defendant No.4 herein as plaintiff No.1 for the relief of partition of agricultural land ad-measuring 6.75 acres in Village Auchandi, Delhi and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the said land. In the plaint as original filed it was the case that Shri Nand Ram Verma being the father of the plaintiff and the defendants 1,2and4 (who was then the plaintiff No.1) and the grandfather of the defendant No.3 was the owner of the said land; that after the demise of the said Shri Nand Ram Verma, in or about 1996 there was a settlement amongst the plaintiff, defendants No.1,2,4 and the father of the defendant No.3 as well as the widow of the said Shri Nand Ram Verma whereby all the family members agreed that the present plaintiff being the only daughter of Shri Nand Ram Verma shall be entitled to a equal share in the aforesaid land in terms of the last wishes of Shri Nand Ram Verma; that in accordance with the said f
Hatti v. Sunder Singh AIR 1971 SC 2320
Kale v. Dy. Director of Consolidation AIR 1976 SC 807
Kamla Prasad v. K.K. Pathak 2007 (2) Scale 607
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Association Ltd. v. M.V. Sea Success I & Anr. (2004) 9 SCC 512
Relying upon Mam Raj v. Ram Chander 1974 DLT 227
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.