VIPIN SANGHI
Vijay Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Gyan Chand Jain – Respondent
Vipin Sanghi, J.
1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C (for short the Code) has been preferred for quashing the proceedings initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act titled "Gyan Chand Jain v. Vijay Chaudhary", earlier pending in the Court of Ms. Navita Kumari Bagha and now pending in the Court of Mr. Sudesh Kumar, M.M., Patiala House, New Delhi.
2. The case of the complainant/respondent in his aforesaid complaint is that on 8.8.2004 (which according to the counsel for the respondent should be read as 6.8.2004), the accused/petitioner visited the shop of the complainant and took some diamonds and diamond studded jewellery worth Rs. 1,52,35,000/- on consignment/ sale basis and in lieu thereof, the accused/petitioner issued a cheque bearing No. 061630 for a sum of Rs. 1,52,35,000/- drawn on Federal Bank, Overseas Branch, New Delhi dated 10.4.2006. It is further alleged that the complainant presented the said cheque through its banker for collection and the same has been returned unpaid with the remarks "funds insufficient" and "payment stopped by attachment order/court order".
3. The submission of the petitioner is that even according to the co
Pawan Kumar v. Ashish Enterprises and Ors. 1993(1) Crimes 51
Modi Cement Ltd. v. Kuchil Kumar Nandi AIR 1998 SC 1057
Vinod Tanna and Anr. v. Zaheer Siddqui 2002(1) Crimes 104
D. Vinod Shivappa v. Nanda Belliappa 130 (2006) DLT 534 (SC)
Electronics Trade and Technology Development Corporation Ltd.
Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd v. Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. (2000) 2 SCC 745
M.L. Gupta and Anr. v. Ceat Financial Services Ltd. 136 (2007) DLT 308
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.