SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 654

V.K.SHALI
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Gandharv Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:R.M. Bagai, Adv. For Respondents/Defendant: None

JUDGMENT

V.K. Shali, J.

1. These are two petitions filed by two separate petitioners who are brothers in respect two separate shops situated in property No. D-19/8, Main Road, Vijay Colony, 3rd Pushta, Usman Pur. The landlords of these two shops are different but the question involved is common. The present petitions have been filed on account of the order passed by Learned Additional Rent Controller on 3rd June, 2000 denying the benefit of Section 14(2) of the Rent Control Act. Against the said order, an appeal was preferred to the learned Additional Rent Control Tribunal which was also rejected by Shri R.L. Chugh, the then Additional Rent Control Tribunal on 3rd July, 2000, resulting in filing of the two separate petitions.

2. Briefly stated the facts, which are not in dispute, are that the petitioners are the tenants in respect of the two shops. An eviction petition was filed by the respondent, Gandharv Singh in respect of both these shops against Shri Rakesh Kumar and Shri Rajesh Kumar on the ground that they had defaulted in payment of rent despite service of demand notice. The relationship between the landlord and the tenant was not disputed between the parties. So far as the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top