SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 527

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
K. L. Sethi – Appellant
Versus
S. Kishan Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: M.G. Vacher, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: None

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

1. The plaintiff seeks modification of the order dated 6th April, 2009 to the extent directing the plaintiff to furnish undertaking to this Court to, in the event of failing in his case for specific performance, pay to the defendant the difference of the admitted agreed price of Rs. 1,82,50,000/- and Rs. 2.50 crores which was disclosed by the counsel for the plaintiff himself on 6th April, 2009 to be the present market value of the property.

2. The said order was made because in this case, the plaintiff, out of agreed sale consideration of Rs. 1,82,50,000/- has paid only Rs. 10 lacs to the defendant. The written agreement to sell dated 4th July, 2007 provides that the balance Rs. 1,72,50,000/- shall be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant within 90 days of 4th July, 2007; that the defendant shall execute sale deed/document in favour of the plaintiff at the time of receiving full consideration and also deliver vacant, peaceful, physical possession of property and title documents of property. It is also a term of the agreement that if the defendant does not pay the balance consideration, then earnest money of Rs. 10 lacs shall be forfeited and agreem











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top