V.K.JAIN
Narayani Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
V.K. Jain, J.
These are two petitions u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the one under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for quashing the FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom. The petitioner in Criminal Misc. Case No.3447/2009 has sought quashing of FIR No.118/2009 registered at P.S. Narela u/s 376/506 of IPC, whereas the petitioner in Criminal Misc. Case No.3712/2009 has sought quashing of the proceedings arising from FIR No.826/2007 which was initially registered u/s 304-B/498-A of IPC and in which the petitioners were discharged of the offence u/s 304-B of IPC. In WP (Crl.) 858/09, the petitioner has sought quashing of FIR registered u/s 323/186/353/332/34 of IPC and consequential proceedings.
2. In Crl.M.C. No.3447/2009, the prosecutrix who is a married woman, alleged that on 25th April, 2009, she fell sick and informed her husband on telephone who, then sent the petitioner Rajender to her house, for taking her to hospital. The prosecutrix was in semi-conscious state, when the petitioner came to her house. Taking advantage of her condition, the petitioner raped her and then fled from the house before arrival of her maid
2. Central Bureau of Investigation, Vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.
4. B.S. Joshi & Ors v State of Haryana and Anr (2003) 4 SCC 675
5. Jagdish Channana and Ors v. State of Haryana
6. Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab
7. Nikhil Merchant V. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr
8. Central Bureau of Investigation vs. A Ravishankar Prasad & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.