VERY IMPORTANT POINT
Court can grant interim compensation during the pendency of a criminal case involving violence or offences against woman.

JUDGMENT

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.- Subhra Chakraborty (alias - Kalpana) who was a student of the Baptist College, Kohima where the opposite party, Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam was a lecturer, filed a complaint in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kohima, Nagaland, alleging, inter alia, as under:

"3. That, your complainant begs to state that in April 1989 the accused person entered into Baptist College, Kohima as a Lecturer thereof and the complainant was a student of the said College at that relevant period.

4. That, the accused person was in said Service in Kohima from April 1989 till he resigned the Service on 27th Jan., 1995 and was residing in a rented house in Kenezou Valley, Kohima owned by Dr. Zakiebatsu Angam.

5. That, on 6th Feb. 1995 the accused person left for Silcharand presently residing in his uncles (Shri Amiya Kanta Chakraborty) house in Premtala, Silchar-4, Dist. Cachar, in the State of Assam and assumed his service as Lecturer in Cachar College (Commerce Dept.) Silthar - 4 (Assam).

6. That on the 10th June, 1989 for the 1st time the accused visited the complainants residence in Kohima and thereafter often he used to visit complainants residence, as a teacher he was respected by the complainant as well as all the members including her parents. In course of such visits once in the month of Nov. 1989 the accused voluntarily told your complainant that he was already in her love. Thus there developed a love affair between themselves since 1989.

7. That, the complainant most humbly states further that with mala fide intention to practise deception on the complainant, the accused gave false assurance of marriage to the innocent complainant and thereby the accused dishonestly procured sexual intercourse with the complainant. The accused often use to induce the complainant to have biological contact with him, but whenever he was approached by the complainant to complete the marriage ceremony, the accused very tactfully used to defer the marriage sometimes saying that he was waiting for his parents formal consent and sometimes saying to cooperate him till he got a Govt. Service.

8. That, in course of continuation of the affairs between the complainant and the accused, the complainant got pregnant twice, once in the month of September, 1993 and secondly in the month of April 1994 out of her co-habitation with the accused person.

9. That, the complainant being worried about her said pregnancy created pressure upon the accused to marry her immediately arid to save her from being ruined, but the accused on the pica of his parents permission went on deferring the marriage, as a result, there was a quarrel in between the complainant and the accused, where after the accused lastly opined for secret marriage to avoid social gathering as he was waiting for his parents permission. The complainant being pregnant was placed in a very awkward position, as such, agreed to said secrete marriage, accordingly the accused on the 20th September, 1993, married the complainant in front of the God he worships in his, residence in Kenozou Valley, Kohima by putting Venlillion (sindur) on the complainants forehead and accepted the complainants his lawful wife and thus the complainant was consorted and consoled. But the complainant faced further corporal punishment, as the accused kept on insisting the complainant to be refrained from giving birth to the baby and was pressurising her to undergo operation/abortion despite her refusal for the same. The accused with fraudulent intention to deceive the complainant proposed the said abortion on the plea that birth of the baby would be a barrier to convince his parents to accept the complainant as their daughter-in-law and such event would lead the complainant to a path of unhappiness. The complainant being an innocent lady failed to understand the accuseds wicked and mischievous plan whereby the accused succeeded and dishonestly motivated the complainant for abortion and compelled the complainant to un