BADAR DURREZ AHMED
Anjulika Vinod Dewan – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Laxmi Chauhan – Respondent
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.
1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 151 CPC for leave to deliver interrogatories. One of the questions in the suit is with regard to the property No. 11, Court Road, Gate No. 1, Civil Lines, Delhi-110 054. It is the case of the plaintiff that this property was acquired by the plaintiffs father though purchased in the name of the defendant No. 1. Consequently, it is the case of the plaintiff that she has a share in the property. On this question, the defendants have taken the stand in the written statement that the plaintiff is not entitled to any share in this property and that the late Shri Yograj Chauhan (father of the plaintiff and husband of defendant No. 1) did not own any immovable property at the time of his demise.
2. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the interrogatories can be issued to the defendants so as to elucidate and clarify the matters in issue. This would also be necessary to cut short the controversy in the case. He submitted that the list of interrogatories given in annexure "A" to the application would be necessary and in support of this submission, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.