MUKUL MUDGAL, VIPIN SANGHI
Savitri Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Kanti Bhai Damani – Respondent
1. This appeal challenges the order of the learned Single Judge dated 31st March, 2008 by which the award dated 25th August, 2001 passed by the respondent no.3 in favour of the predecessor in interest of the appellant herein, and against respondents no.1 and 2 was set aside. The appellant is the mother of Sh. Ashwini K. Goenka, the original respondent. The objection petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had been preferred by respondent no.1 herein, arraying Sh. Aswini Goenka as respondent no.1 , Smt. Kusum Lata Damani W/o Kanti Bhai Damani as respondent no.2 and the Arbitrator Sh. D.P. Jain, who is the father of Smt. Kusum Lata Damani as respondent no.3.
2. The case of respondent no.1 herein, as pleaded in the objection petition has been adequately summarized by the learned Single Judge as follows: -2. According to the averments, the petitioner and second respondent are husband and wife, their marriage was solemnized in 1980. It is alleged that in 1982 the petitioner and his wife came into contact with the first respondent (since deceased), as the later was dealing in non-ferrous metals. The parties joined hands in a business relati
Balvant N. Viswamitra and Ors. v
Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Friends Coal Carbonization 2006 (4) SCC 445
Jagdish Chander v. Ramesh Chander (2007) 5 SCC 719
K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi . (1998) 3 SCC 573
Mc Dermott International lnc v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. 2006 (11) SCC 181
Oil & Natural Gas v. Saw Pipes Ltd. 2003 (5) SCC 705
Union of India v. Tecco Trichy Engineers and Constructions 2005 (4) SCC 239
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.