SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 914

S.L.BHAYANA
PRAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
GOELS ROLLING MILLS PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.K Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. H.D. Sharma, Advocate
Mr. Sidharth Silwal ,Adv

JUDGMENT

S.L. BHAYANA, J. This is an application filed by the Applicants/Defendants under Order I Rule 10 read with Order VII Rule 11 and under Section 151 of CPC, seeking deletion of defendant No.1 from the array of the parties.

2. Factual background of the instant suit from which the particular controversy arises is that the plaintiffs have, vide agreement, dated 27/12/2006, decided to sell of their shares of defendant No.1, i.e, Company, M/s Goel Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd, having its registered office at 32, Todermal Colony, Najafgarh, New Delhi. Defendant Nos.2 & 3 have agreed to purchase 12500 equity shares for a total consideration of Rs.41,50,000/-. In order to obtain the recovery of the above mentioned amount, the plaintiffs have filed the instant suit thereby also impleaded M/s.Goel Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd as Defendant No.1.

3. To support this application, Defendant No.1 has made the following submission that there was no privity of contract between the Plaintiff No.1 and Defendant No.1. Defendant No.1 was never a party to the agreement dated 27/12/2006, which was executed and signed by Defendant No. 2 and Defendant No. 3 in their individual capacity for sale and purchase









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top