SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1000

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SRS ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
HOME STORES – Respondent


Adovcates appeared:
Mr Santosh Kumar with Mr Manish Kumar, Advocates.
Mr. Tarun Singhla and Mr K.C. Joshi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. Execution was sought of an arbitral award dated 27th October, 2005 stated to be having force of a decree, under the Arbitration Act, 1996. Notice of the execution petition was issued to the judgment debtor. On 21 April, 2009 it was reported that upon the notice being tendered to the person available at the address of the judgment debtor, the said person after talking to the Managing Director of the judgment debtor on telephone, refused to accept the notice for the reason of the same bearing a different address of the judgment debtor. This court finding the judgment debtor to have avoided service, issued warrants of attachment of the monies lying in the bank account of the judgment debtor to the extent of Rs 6,10,000/- claimed in the execution petition. The said attachment was effected and a cheque for Rs 6,10,000/- received in this court. However, the judgment debtor thereafter preferred OMP under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1996 with respect to the arbitral award under execution.

2. The OMP was instituted in this court first on 10th August, 2009. The institution thereof, calculated from the date of the award i.e., 3rd July, 2008 was b


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top