SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 59

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
MANITA KHURANA – Appellant
Versus
INDRA KHURANA – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Advocate

Judgment

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the defendant in a suit instituted by the respondent/plaintiff and with respect to the order dated 10th November, 2009 of the Additional District Judge, dismissing the application of the petitioner/defendant for transfer of the suit to the Family Court in view of Sections 7 & 8 of the Family Court Act, 1984. The counsel for the petitioner was heard on the aspect of issuance of notice of the petition to the respondent on 7th December, 2009 and the order reserved; since the suit was listed before the learned Additional District Judge for recording the evidence of the petitioner/defendant on the very next day, vide order of the same day, it was further directed that the learned Additional District Judge shall adjourn the hearing awaiting the orders of this Court.

2. The petitioner/defendant is the daughter-in-law of the respondent/ plaintiff. The respondent/plaintiff has instituted the suit for the relief of ejectment of the petitioner/defendant from house No.G-1, Pocket-II, Neelgiri Apartments, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi-110028. It is inter alia the case of the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top