PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, SURESH KAIT
SANDY @ VED PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 21.05.2008, the appellants; Devender @ Kala s/o Ram Kumar, Sandy @ Ved Prakash s/o Rajpal, Sanjay s/o Zile Singh, Sheel @ Sushil s/o Mahabir Singh and Jasbir @ Lily s/o Balbir Singh, have been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and Section 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. For the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine in sum of Rs.5,000/-; in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. For the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and pay fine in sum of Rs.5,000/-; in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.
2. The broad contours of the case set up by the prosecution against the appellants is that in the afternoon of 12.01.2002 when one Ms.B (herein after referred to as the “Deceased”) was on her way to the agricultural fields owned by her family, the appellants caught hold of her and committed rape upon her. On being r
2. Sudhakar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
7. Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State
8. Gangula Mohan Reddy v. State of A.P.
9. Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Senger v. State of M.P.
10. Nallam Veera v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.
11. Sreerama Murthy v. State of AP
13. Sharad Birdichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.