SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 1251

MANMOHAN, MUKUL MUDGAL
GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atul Sharma and Mr. Milanka Chaudhury,
Advs.
Mr. Dushyant Dave and Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Ravi Kini, Mr. Krishan Kumar, Mr. Sumit Gupta, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Madhuri Diwan and Ms. Padma Priya, Advs. for respondent No. 1/NHAI. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, ASG with Mr. Gaurav Duggal and Mr. Chetan Chawla, Adv. for respondent No.2/UOI. With
Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedy, Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath and Mr. Mohit Chadha, Advocates.
Mr. Gopal Subramanium, ASG with Mr. Gaurav Duggal and Mr. Chetan Chawla, Adv. for respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Dushyant Dave and Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Ravi Kini, Mr. Krishan Kumar, Mr. Sumit Gupta, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Madhuri Diwan and Ms. Padma Priya, Advs. for respondent No. 2/NHAI.

J U D G M E N T

MUKUL MUDGAL, J.

1. The present petition challenges the letter No. NHAI/BOT/11012/66/2005/3940 dated 26th August, 2008 issued by the respondent no.1 National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as NHAI ) to the petitioner consortium intimating the petitioner that it is not eligible to participate in the second stage of the bidding process (the bid stage) in supercession of its earlier letter dated June 27, 2008 pursuant to which the consortium had been declared pre-qualified for the project in question i.e. Design, engineering, construction, development, finance, operation and maintenance of Hyderabad- Vijayawada section of the National Highway 9 (hereinafter referred to as NH9) from KM 40.000 to KM 221.500 of NH 9 in the state of Andhra Pradesh under National Highways Development Programme Phase IIIA on Build Operate and Transfer-toll Basis. The petitioner No.1 GMR Infrastructure Ltd. had applied pursuant to the Request For Qualification (RFQ), issued by the respondent No. 1 NHAI in December, 2007. It is not in dispute that pursuant to the process of evaluation and after compliance of the terms of the tender, and in particular Clause 3.5.2, the pet














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top