RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SUNIL KAPOOR – Appellant
Versus
HIMMAT SINGH – Respondent
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the defendant in a suit pending before the Court of Additional District Judge, aggrieved from the order dated 14th May, 2007 dismissing the application of the petitioner/defendant under Section 10 of the CPC.
2. The respondents/plaintiffs sued the petitioner/defendant for ejectment and for recovery of mesne profits / damages for use and occupation. It is the case of the respondents/plaintiffs that the petitioner/defendant was a tenant under the respondents/plaintiffs with respect to premises at N-246, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New
Delhi at a rent of Rs.4,000/- per month; that the tenancy of the petitioner/defendant has been determined; that he has failed to vacate the premises.
3. The petitioner/defendant does not dispute that he was a tenant under the respondents/plaintiffs at a rate of Rs.4,000/- per month. He applied under Section 10 of the CPC contending that he had prior to the institution of the suit for ejectment against him instituted a suit in this Court being CS(OS) No.1018/2004 against the respondents/plaintiffs for specific performance of agreemen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.