SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 642

V.B.GUPTA
Tarsem Singh, S/o Gurbachan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurvinder Singh, S/o Sh. Harbhajan Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Adv.
Nemo.

JUDGMENT

V.B.Gupta, J. Present revision petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short as 'Act') has been filed against order dated 8th February, 2010, passed by Additional Rent Controller (for short as 'Controller') Delhi. Vide impugned order, application of petitioner/tenant for leave to defend was dismissed and eviction order was passed in favour of respondent/landlord and against petitioner.

2. Respondent filed eviction petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of Act on the ground that he is the owner and landlord of premises bearing no. WZ-152, Mukherjeet Park, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi. Petitioner is his tenant in respect of shop in above said property as shown in red colour in the site plan, at monthly rent of Rs.715/- exclusive of other charges. Respondent is a trained and qualified technician who has obtained three years T.V., V.C.R. servicing course certificate and is capable of repairing and servicing of mobile phones by virtue of his twenty years experience in this filed. He and his family is facing financial hardship due to his low income whereas, persons who are less qualified and competent than him are generating very






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top