1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes DIPAK MISRA, CJ In this public interest litigation the petitioner, a retired professor, as pro bono publico, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: “(a) directing respondents 3 to 6, all their teacher members and all other teachers to forthwith start teaching the new syllabi for all the prescribed 13 under-graduate science courses according to the semester system as directed by the University and to complete it before the examinations scheduled from December 6, 2010 onwards; (b) directing respondents No. 3 to 6 not to continue any strike / dharna and to declare such forms of protests by teachers as illegal and / or unconstitutional; (c) directing respondent No.1 and / or the relevant college managements to implement order dated 12.8.2010 of Respondent No.2 under Statute 11-G(4) of the University of Delhi Act, 1922 and the policy decision of the University of No Work-No Pay against those teachers who are resorting