SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 23

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
P. E. LYALL – Appellant
Versus
BALWANT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate.
Mr. R.M. Sinha, Advocate.

Judgment

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

1. The challenge by means of these two Regular First Appeals (RFAs) filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.12.2001.

2. The impugned judgment and decree disposed of two suits, suit Nos. 451/1995 and 34/2001. Suit No. 451/1995 was a suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession of portion of ground floor of the property No. D-1043, ward No. 8, opposite Babar Kothi, Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the suit/subject property). Suit No. 34/2001 was a suit filed for injunction to restrain the defendants in the suit from carrying out any construction on the suit property. Plaintiff in the suit, and the respondent herein, Sh. Balwant Singh claimed the reliefs of possession and injunction on the ground that he was the owner of the suit property. There were four defendants in the suit. Defendant No. 1 Mrs. P.E. Lyall, the appellant herein, is the sister of the plaintiff/Sh. Balwant Singh. The other defendants being defendant Nos. 2 to 4 were the legal heirs of the late brother of the respondent/plaintiff namely, late Sh.George J. Singh. Defendant No.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top