RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The short point in controversy in this petition is as to whether a writ impugning the order of determination of perpetual lease is not maintainable for the reason of it being open to the affected person to impugn such determination in proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act).

2. This writ petition has been filed impugning the notice dated 21st November, 2005 of the respondent no.1 DDA determining the perpetual lease with respect to the plot No. A-22 Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase II, New Delhi as well as the notice dated 5th May, 2006 subsequently issued by the respondent no.2 Estate Officer, DDA under Section 4 of the PP Act. Notice of the writ petition was issued and vide order dated 19th July, 2006 the Estate Officer was restrained from passing any final order pursuant to the notice (supra) under Section 4 of the PP Act issued to the petitioner. Pleadings have been completed and counsels have been heard.

3. The petitioner was granted perpetual lease of the aforesaid plot of land vide indenture dated 20th April, 1992. The respondent DDA vide notice dated 10th May, 2000 to the petiti