RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, A.K.SIKRI
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
A.K. SIKRI (ACJ.)
1. In all these writ petitions challenge is to the constitutional validity of Clause 26.4 of the Parole/Furlough: Guidelines, 2010. These Guidelines are approved by the Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi which are applicable in case of convicts i.e. those who have been convicted by a competent court under various laws and are undergoing sentencing in prison. The purpose of the Guidelines is to regulate applications for parole and furlough and to ensure that they are considered in a fair and transparent manner. Separate provisions for regular parole as well as furlough are made in these Guidelines. Insofar as grant of furlough is concerned which is the subject matter of these writ petitions, Clause 24 states that a prisoner who is sentenced to 5 years or more of rigorous imprisonment and has undergone imprisonment for 3 years or more period excluding remission, can be released on furlough. A prisoner is entitled 7 weeks of furlough in a year. The first spell can be of 3 weeks while the subsequent spells have to be of 2 weeks each. Clause 26.4 mentions eligibility conditions which a prisoner has to fulfill before he would be eligible to obtain furlough.
Avtar Singh V State of Haryana AIR 2002 SC 1109
State of Haryana & ors. V Mohinder Singh 2000 (3) SCC 394
Charanjit Lal V State of Delhi 28 (1985) DLT 92
Bhikhabhai Devshi V State of Gujarat & ors. AIR 1987 Guj 136
Govindbhai Mansing Dabhi V State of Gujarat 2005 (3) GLH 169
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.