SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 263

A. N. GROVER, A. N. RAY, I. D. DUA, J. C. SHAH, K. S. HEGDE, M. HIDAYATULLAH
Rustom Cowasjee Cooper – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. :- This petition is an off-shoot of the decision of this Court on the constitutional validity of the Banking Companies (Acquisition of Transfer of Undertakings) Act, being Act 22 of 1969. By a majority of ten Judges against one, this Court declared the Act to be unconstitutional. The decision of the Court was given on February 10, 1970.*

2. On February 13, 1970, a meeting was organised by the Blitz National forum at Vithalbhai Patel House at Delhi. It was presided over by Mr. Mohan Kumaramangalam, an advocate of this Court. According to the news items published the next day in the Hindustan Times, the Times of India and the Patriot, a number of persons spoke about the Act and the decision of this Court upon it. Among the speakers were Mr. R. K. Khadilkar, Minister in the Ministry of Finance, Mr. A. S. R. Chari, Mr. Kumaramangalam, Mr. Prabhatkar, Mr. S. M. Joshi, M. P., Mr. Bhupesh Gupta, M. P. and Mr. V. K. Krishna Menon, M. P. These speakers criticised the decision. Mr. R. K. Khadilkar, the Hindustan Times reported, said that such decisions do not enhance the prestige of the Judiciary , that such acts on the part of the highest Court will only encour



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top