VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Rajiv Khanpuri – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is by the appellant/plaintiff to the impugned judgment of the trial Court dated 5.6.2004 decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff-bank for recovery of Rs. 1,67,900/- with interest @ 12% per annum and proportionate costs, which was filed as the appellant/defendant failed to repay the amount of a dishonoured cheque which he had withdrawn.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/defendant deposited a cheque of Rs. 1,50,000/- with the respondent-bank and which was presented for encashment through clearing on 3.11.1999. The account of the appellant/defendant was credited on the same date. The cheque in question was returned unpaid on 4.11.1999, however, the dishonoured cheque alongwith memo of drawee bank was lost in the transit and therefore the respondent-bank could not make a debit entry of the sum of Rs. 1,50,000/-for adjusting the credit entry of Rs. 1,50,000/- which was made assuming the cheque was cleared. The appellant withdrew the amount and took benefit thereof. When the respondent-bank received information abou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.