K.N.SAIKIA, G.L.OZA
Mahabir Kishore – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
Judgment
SAIKIA, J.:- This plaintiffs appeal by special leave is from the appellate judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the appeal upholding the judgment of the trial Court dismissing the plaintiffs suit on the ground of limitaiton.
2. A registered firm Rai Saheb Nandkishore Rai Saheb Jugalkishore (Appellants) was allotted contracts for manufacture and sale of liquor for the calendar year 1959 and for the subsequent period from 1-1-1960 to 31-3-1961 for Rs.2,56,200.00 and Rs.4,71, 960.00, respectively, by the Government of Madhya Pradesh who also charged 71/2 percent over the auction money as mahua and fuel cess. As writ petitions challenging the Governments right to charge this 71/2 per cent were pending in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Government announced that it would continue to charge it and the question of stopping it was under consideration of the Government whose decision would be. binding on the contractors. The firm (appellants) thus paid for the above contracts a total extra sum of Rs. 54,606.00/-.
3. On 17-10-1961 the Under Secretary to Government, M. P., Forest Department, Bhopal wrote the following letter No.10 130X/ 61 (Exhibit D-23) to the Chief
Shiv Shanker Dal Mills v. State of Haryana
UPSEB v. City Board, Mussooire
relied on : Sales Tax Officer v. Kanhaiya Lal
D. Cawasji and Co. v. State of Mysore
Madras Port Trust v. Hymanshu International
Shri Vallabh Glass Works Ltd. v. Union of India
CST v. Auriaya Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad
Salonah Tea Co. Ltd. v. Superintendent of Taxes, Nowgong
referred to : Sales Tax Officer v. Budh Prakash Jai Prakash
Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.