SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 393

INDERMEET KAUR
Vijay Kumar Goel – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Charan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Girish Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Rohit Madan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

INDERMEET KAUR, J:

1. Order impugned before this Court is the order dated 09.09.1998 passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT) which had reversed the finding of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 05.03.1991. Vide order dated 05.03.1991, the eviction petition filed by the landlord Vijay Kumar Goel seeking eviction of his tenant Shiv Charan on the ground under Section 14 (1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘DRCA’) on the ground of sub-letting; contention being that the original tenant had parted with possession of the suit premises in favour of M/s Century Plastic had been decreed. The impugned judgment had reversed this finding; it had dismissed the eviction petition.

2. Record shows that the disputed premises comprise of first floor consisting of two big halls, glazed chajja abutting toward Gali Charkha Walan and a glazed verandah towards Chawri Bazar and a bath and WC forming part of premises No. 4027-28, Ward No. VI, Chawri Bazar, Delhi as depicted in red colour in the site plan filed in the trial Court. Contention of the landlord was that the tenant Shiv Charan had parted with possession of the suit premises in favour













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top