MANMOHAN
Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.40/2009 dated 07th March, 2009 registered with Police Station Mandir Marg, New Delhi under Section 3(1)(x) of The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 read with Section 7(d) of The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
2. The relevant facts of the present case are that the petitioners produced and directed the Hindi motion picture titled “Delhi-6” (hereinafter referred to as “the film”). The film was viewed and cleared by the Central Board of Film Certification (in short “CBFC”), Ministry of Information and Broadcasting with a ‘U/A’Certificate bearing CBFC No. C-II/2/17/09 dated 09th February, 2009.
3. Upon commercial release of the film on 20th February, 2009 the aforesaid FIR was registered on 07th March, 2009 by respondent No.2- complainant. It was alleged in the complaint that for the last five/six days, the aforesaid film had been shown in Delhi cinema halls in which the character enacting the role of a lady sweeper had been insulted and thereby the entire Balmiki Samaj had been insulted. The
Bobby Art International & ors. V Om Pal Singh Hoon & ors. 1996 (4) SCC 1
James Sebastian & anr. v State of Assam & anr. 2008 CrLJ 3634
Rajiv Kumar Sadh & ors. v Govt. of NCT Delhi & anr. 2001 (89) DLT 419
S. Rangarajan V P. Jagjivan Ram & ors. 1989 (2) SCC 574
S. Khushboo v Kanniammal & anr. 2010 (5) SCC 600
K.A. Abbas V The Union of India & anr. 1970 (2) SCC 780
Adalat Prasad v Rooplal Jindal & ors. 2004 (7) SCC 338
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.