VIPIN SANGHI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
BABITA PAL – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH BANSAL – Respondent
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
C.M. No. No. 19831/2012 (for condonation of 6 days’ delay in filing the appeal) & C.M. No. No. 19832/2012 (for condonation of 23 days’ in re-filing the appeal)
Notice, which is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent.
For the reasons set out in the applications, the delays in filing and re-filing the appeal are condoned subject to payment of Rs. 7,500/-as costs to the respondent.
The applications are allowed. The costs to be paid within a week.
C.M. No. 20278/2012 (under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC)
Notice, which is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent.
The appellants seek to amend the prayer clause by specifically incorporating the orders passed on different applications qua which he seeks relief in the appeal.
The application is not opposed and is, accordingly, allowed.
FAO(OS) No. 569/2012
1. Admit.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. With the consent of parties, we have heard learned counsels and proceed to dispose of the present appeal.
3. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail the order dated 07.08.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of the following applications: (i) I.A. No. 5347/2012 (under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.