SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 2010

HIMA KOHLI
C. P. KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Narendera Kalra, Advocate

Judgment

HIMA KOHLI, J.

1. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff for the recovery of a sum of Rs.54,50,960/- jointly and severally against the defendants. The reliefs sought by the plaintiff in the present suit are as follows:-

(A) Pass a decree for a sum of Rs.54,50,960.00 in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants jointly and severally.

(B) Pass an interim order to pay the monthly pension with immediate effect as it is required for the plaintiff to meet out the route expenses and other expenses such as medical as the plaintiff do not have any regular source of income at this age.

(C) Pass necessary directions against the defendant No.6 i.e. M/s Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. thereby directing this defendant to pay the highest value of the shares which were allotted to the employees of M/s Citi Bank to the plaintiff of his share.

(D) Allow interest pendentility and future @ 12% per annum in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant from the date of filing of the suit till its realization.

(E) Allow cost of the suit.”

2. The present suit was listed before the Joint Registrar for admission on 4.9.2012 on which date, learned counsel for the plain













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top