SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 671

High Court of Delhi
SANJIV KHANNA & VED PRAKASH, JJ.
Mohd. Saleem
Versus
The State
Criminal Appeal No. 484 of 2011
Decided on : 31-05-2013

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:R.M. Tufail, Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP.

The judgment clarifies the application of common intention under Section 34 IPC, emphasizing the need for a pre-arranged plan or simultaneous consensus of mind among co-perpetrators, and the distinction between the criminal act and the mental intention to commit the act.

Headnote:

COMMON INTENTION - CRIMINAL LIABILITY - SECTIONS 302, 307, 427, 4, 5(1) IPC - SUMMARY

Fact of the Case:

The appellant challenges his conviction under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act for causing death, attempting to cause death, and transporting and selling cow meat. The prosecution's case involves a PCR van being hit by a tempo carrying slaughtered cow meat, resulting in the death of a police officer and injuries to another. The appellant was identified as one of the individuals involved in the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant shared common intention for the offence committed under Section 304A IPC, but not for murder or culpable homicide. The court also upheld the appellant's conviction under the Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act and Section 427 IPC.

Issues: The court considered whether the appellant had committed murder or a lesser offence, and whether he shared a common intention with the co-accused. The court also examined the evidence related to the transportation and sale of cow meat.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of common intention under Section 34 IPC, emphasizing the need for a pre-arranged plan or simultaneous consensus of mind among co-perpetrators. The court also clarified the distinction between the criminal act and the mental intention to commit the act, and the significance of the words 'in furtherance of common intention.'

Final Decision: The appellant's conviction for murder and attempted murder was set aside, and he was convicted under Section 304A IPC. His convictions under the Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act and Section 427 IPC were upheld.

Judgment :-

Vaish Sanjiv Khanna, J.

1. Mohd. Saleem by this appeal challenges his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for having caused death of Head Constable Naresh; Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for having attempted to cause death of ASI Jagpal; Section 427 for causing damage to the PCR van i.e. public property and under Sections 4 and 5(1) of Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act for transporting and selling cow meat. By order on sentence dated 25th March, 2011, for the offence under Section 302 IPC the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment; under Section 307 IPC imprisonment of 10 years with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of which, the appellant has to undergo imprisonment of six months; under Section 427 IPC rigorous imprisonment of 1 year and under Section 12 of Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 3 years’ rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo imprisonment of 3 months.

The sentences are to run concurrently.

2. The other co-convict Mohd. Azim was subsequently declared juvenile and the appellate proceedings against him stand closed. At this stage, we may record that the two other co-accused, namely, Aas Mohd. and Mohd. Naushad , who were chargesheeted, have been acquitted. State has not preferred any appeal against their acquittal.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that in the intervening night of 14th and 15th May, 2008 at about 3.45 a.m., PCR van Zebra-85 received a message from Zebra-90 that a tempo bearing registration number UP-14X-9976 loaded with slaughtered cow meat was coming from Dhool Siras. The said vehicle had not stopped despite signal by police officers of Zebra-90. On receipt of this message, PCR van Zebra-85 was parked at Najafgarh T-point, on the road coming from the side of the drain. ASI Jagpal, the driver of Zebra-85 and Head Constable Naresh Kumar came out from the vehicle and stood at the side to stop the tempo coming from Dhool Siras. On seeing the tempo, they signaled the driver to stop. The tempo driver, instead of stopping or passing through the open portion of the road, hit the PCR van. ASI Jagpal was thrown at a distance and Head Constable Naresh was dragged by the tempo. PCR van overturned and got entangled with tempo which eventually stopped at some distance. The tempo, a TATA 407 vehicle, stopped in a heap of rubbish. Driver of the tempo along with his associates ran away from the spot. ASI Jagpal was removed to Safdarjung Hospital by Zebra 90 and Head Constable Naresh was taken to RTR Hospital by Zebra 84, where he was declared brought dead.

4. On the basis of the registration number of tempo TATA 407, investigation was started, which led to Mahesh Chand Gupta (PW-12), the registered owner. PW-12 has deposed that he had expressed interest to purchase the said vehicle from one Iqbal, who did not have documents. Iqbal had promised that he would get the documents prepared from the RTO office. PW-12 had gone to the RTO, Ghaziabad and signed the sale letter on the asking of Iqbal. Subsequently, when the documents were received, PW-12 noticed that in the fitness certificate, the vehicle was described as a ‘tanker’. PW-12 informed Iqbal that he wanted to purchase an open vehicle and not a tanker, to which Iqbal promised that he would make efforts to get the word ‘tanker’ deleted. This, however, did not materialize and the deal was treated as cancelled and the vehicle remained with Iqbal. Iqbal had promised to refund the money within 15 days. PW-12 has deposed that he did not know how the vehicle was used by Iqbal.

5. Mohd. Iqbal appeared as PW-15. He has testified that he was in the business of transport and had purchased TATA 407 vehicle bearing registration number UP-14X-9976 in an auction in December, 2007, but the vehicle remained unused till March, 2008. In March, 2008, Mahesh Chand Gupta (PW-12) met him and showed interest in purchasing the vehic






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top