MANMOHAN SINGH
Eaton Corporation – Appellant
Versus
BCH Electric Limited – Respondent
Manmohan Singh, J.
1. By this order, I shall dispose of two applications under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 & 2, read with Section 151 CPC; first being I.A.No.1204/2012 filed by the plaintiffs, Eaton Corporation & Another in CS(OS) No.156/2012, and second being I.A.No.4318/2012 filed by the defendant BCH Electric Ltd. in its suit being CS(OS) No.575/2012. Both the applications are being decided by common order. In the order, Eaton Corporation & Another would be referred as “Plaintiffs” and BCH Electric Limited would be referred as “Defendant”.
2. The case of the plaintiffs is that plaintiff No.1, M/s Eaton Corporation is a company organized and existing under the laws of United States of America. The plaintiff No.2, Eaton Power Quality Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi is the subsidiary of plaintiff No.1.
3. The plaintiff No.1 (the expression whereof shall include its predecessors-in-interest and title) are engaged in the business of the manufacture and sale of “electric apparatus for use in operating machines, engines and motor by current control and electrical supplies, consisting of; controllers for dynamoelectric machines to wit; starting, stopping, reversing, and speed regulating appara
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.