VIPIN SANGHI
Rajiv Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Delhi High Court Bar Association – Respondent
I.A. No.17827/2013 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The plaintiff is granted four weeks time to file better copies of dim documents and to file the original documents in his power and possession. Application stands disposed of.
C.S. (OS) No.2149/2013
Issue summons in the suit to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registrar by ordinary process, registered AD speed post and authorised courier, to be listed along with C.S. (OS) No.2111/2013 titled “Delhi Bar Association & Ors. V. Delhi High Court Bar Association & Anr.”
I.A. No.17828/2013
1. Issue notice to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registrar by ordinary process, registered AD speed post and authorised courier.
2. I have heard detailed submissions of the plaintiff in person, who presses this application for grant of ex-parte ad interim orders of injunction. Since I am not inclined to pass ex parte ad interim orders of injunction, and detailed submissions have been made, I consider it appropriate to record my reasons therefor.
3. The plaintiff, who is a practising advocate and has been, inter alia, the Additional Secretary, Hony. Secretary and Presiden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.