S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

1. This a review petition filed against the order and judgment of this Court in WP(C) No. 5889/2013, dated 1.10.2013. In this writ petition, directions were sought, inter alia, to the Company Law Board to frame regulations in respect of lodging caveats before that body (hereafter “the CLB”) as well as to this Court, to regulate filing of caveats, under Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). More specifically, a direction was sought that some orders of the CLB made are a nullity, and therefore, liable to be quashed.

2. Briefly, the petitioners had filed the above writ petition, praying, inter alia, for declaring that the impugned order of the Bench Officer ‘reviewing’ his decision to register a caveat (leading thus to an order dated 12.9.2013) is a nullity in law. The petitioners claimed to have filed a caveat before the CLB on 10.9.13 in Vikram Bakshi v. Connaught Plaza Restaurants for notice of any hearings scheduled to take place in the matter, and for the provision of all documents tendered by the parties to the CLB. In the caveat application under Section 148A, CPC, at paragraphs 4-14, the caveat petitioners also sought to establish the