SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 80

V.K.JAIN
Rakesh @ Shanker – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms. Charu Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Satish Verma, APP.

Judgment :

V.K. Jain, J.

Oral Judgement:

1. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that on 21.9.2007, when the police officials were present at bus stand Punjabi Bagh, checking buses passing from there, the appellant before this Court got down from the bus. At that time he was carrying a box on his shoulders. An informer who was present on the spot, informed Inspector Ishwar Singh, one of the police officials referred above, that the appellant was going to supply ganja in the jhuggies and the box being carried by him contained ganja. On search of the trunk being carried by the appellant, 21 kg of ganja is alleged to have been recovered. This is also the case of the prosecution that before searching the trunk being carried by the appellant, a notice under Section 50 of NDPS Act was given to the appellant, who stated that he did not want the evidence to be created against him by calling the Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer and, therefore, no such person should be called.

2. Since the appellant pleaded not guilty to the charged framed against him, the prosecution examined as many as eight witnesses. One witness was examined in defence.

3. The complainant Inspector Ishwar Singh came in

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top