RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Registrar, Indian Council of Arbitration – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Sidhu – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 04.06.2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-1, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Suit No.11/2011 (ID No.02403C0004482011) filed by the respondent) in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the appellant/defendant for recovery of Rs.5,02,500/- together with costs and interest, pendente lite and future at 10% per annum.
2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. The respondent/plaintiff has filed cross objections. The appeal and the cross objections were admitted for hearing and with the consent of the counsels heard finally and judgment reserved.
3. The respondent/plaintiff on 22.01.2011 instituted the suit from which this appeal arises for recovery of Rs.5,25,000/- from the appellant/defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum with effect from 23.03.2007 and till the date of payment, pleading:
(i) that the respondent/plaintiff, a senior advocate was on 06.04.2005 appointed by the appellant/defendant as a Presiding Arbitrator in two arbitration matters registered with the appellant/defendant as AC No.1430/2005 and AC
Ahmadsahab Abdul Mulla Vs. Bibijan (2009) 5 SCC 462 (Paras No.11&12)
J.P. Bansal Vs. State of Rajasthan (2003) 5 SCC 134
Sukhmander Singh Vs. State of Punjab (1999) 9 SCC 55
Food Corporation of India Vs. Babulal Agarwal (2004) 2 SCC 712.
S.V. Harihara Iyer Vs. Mathew George AIR 1965 Ker. 187
State of Kerala Vs. Cochin Chemical Refineries Ltd. AIR 1968 SC 1361
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.