Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. We are concerned in the above captioned batch of appeals with the provision of Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the reason vide impugned judgment and order dated December 24, 2014 four identically worded suits against four defendants seeking a decree for recovery of possession and damages have been decreed in so far prayer made was for recovery of possession. The decree is on an admission.

2. The legislative provision, Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under :-

“6. Judgment on Admission.-

(1) Where admissions of fact have been made either in the pleading or otherwise, whether orally or in writing, the Court may at any stage of the suit, either on the application of any party or of its own motion and without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, makes such order or gives such judgment as it may think fit, having regard to such admissions.

(2) Whenever a judgment is pronounced under sub-Rule (1), a decree shall be drawn up in accordance with the judgment and the decree shall bear the date on which the judgment was pronounced.”

3. The word ‘otherwise’ after the expression ‘made