S.MURALIDHAR
Rajesh Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Through Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th January 2009 passed by the Special Judge, Central District02, Delhi in CC No. 195/01 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘PC Act’) and the order on sentence dated 27th January 2009 whereby for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act, the Appellant was sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment (‘RI’) with a fine of Rs. 15,000 and in default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment (‘SI’) for 30 days and for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the PC Act, to RI for 2½ years and fine of Rs.15,000 and in default to undergo SI for 30 days. Both sentences were directed to run concurrently. By an order dated 4th February 2009 while admitting the appeal, the sentence awarded to the Appellant was suspended.
The case of the prosecution
2. The case of the prosecution is that Mrs. Madhu Bala, the Complainant (PW-3) was running a business of packing, shipping and a travel agency under the name and style of M/s. Duro Pack at C-4/67, SDA, New Delhi and was filing her income tax retur
Sohan v. State of Haryana (2001) 3 SCC 620 and Narain v. State of Punjab AIR 1959 SC 484.
Niranjan Singh v. CBI (2013) 203 DLT 635
Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 4 SCC 143
State of UP v. Dr. G.K. Ghosh (1984) 1 SCC 254
Parkash Chand v. State 1979 (3) SCC 90
Mahabir Prasad Verma v. Dr. Surinder Kaur (1982) 2 SCC 258
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116
C.S. Krishnamurthy v. State of Karnataka (2005) 4 SCC 81).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.