VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Jagdamba Impex – Appellant
Versus
Tristar Products – Respondent
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
1. This first appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC impugning the order of the trial court dated 19.2.2014 which has allowed the application of the respondent/plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC and dismissed the application of the appellant/defendant under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. Appellant/defendant by the impugned order has been restrained from using a machine which is used for manufacturing of combs on the ground that the machine is a copy of the machine made by the respondent/plaintiff from the drawings over which respondent/plaintiff has a copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957.
2. The complete facts with respect to the case/claim as put forward on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff are succinctly stated in paras 1 to 3 of the impugned judgment and the same read as under :
1. “The plaintiff through present suit is seeking permanent injunction, rendition of account, delivery up etc by putting up a case that plaintiff is engaged in business of manufacturing and marketing of cosmetic products, viz. Nail cutters, nail sharpeners, fillers, trimmers, buffs, manicure set, pedicure set, brushes, scrubbing brushes etc and allied and cognate goods
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.