SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 841

SANJIV KHANNA, G.P.MITTAL
Gaurav Mehta – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioners:A. Maitri, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Rajiv Bansal, Ray Chaudhary, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Sanjiv Khanna J. (Oral)

1. The Petitioners herein in alternative seek modification or amendment of Rule 14 (c) of the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970 (Rules, 1970 for short) fixing the maximum eligibility age limit for candidates to appear in the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2014.

2. This Court exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot modify or amend recruitment rules, i.e. Recruitment Rules of Delhi Judicial Service. This Court has power of judicial review and can examine constitutional vires of any provision including the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970 while exercising the writ jurisdiction but cannot legislate or rewrite the rule. The alternative prayer therefore made in the writ petition does not require consideration or acceptance.

3. The main prayer made in the writ petition is that Rule 14 of the Rules, 1970 is ultra vires and violates fundamental rights of the Petitioners under Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India as the petitioners are not eligible to appear in the Delhi Judicial Services Examination, 2014.

4. Rule 14 of the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970 reads as under:-

“14. A candidate shall be eligib





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top