G.S.SISTANI
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Garg – Respondent
G.S. Sistani, J (Oral)
IA. No.1704/2013
1. This is an application seeking condonation of 13 days? delay in re-filing the application for summons for judgment.
2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay in re-filing the application for summons for judgment is condoned.
3. Application stands disposed of.
IA. No.1703/2013
4. This is an application for summons for judgment. Since the leave to defend application has already been filed, the present application stands disposed of.
IA. No.5765/2013
5. This is an application for condonation of 22 days? delay in filing the application for leave to defend.
6. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the leave to defend application is condoned.
7. Application stands disposed of.
IA. No.5764/2013
8. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under the provisions of Order 37 CPC and the application, IA. No.5764/2013, has been filed by the defendant seeking leave to defend.
9. Before the rival submissions of the counsel for the parties can be considered, it would be useful to notice the facts of the case as set out in the plaint. As per the plain
V.K. Enterprises Vs. Shiva Steels (2010) 9 SCC 256
Bushing Schmitz Private Limited v. P.T. Menghani (1977) 3 SCR 312
T. Arvindandam Vs. T.V. Satyapal, AIR 1977 SC 2421
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Association Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I (2004) 9 SCC 512
ITC Limited Vs. Debts Recovery Appellant Tribunal, (1998) 2 SCC 70
Krishna Devi Malchand Kamathia v. Bombay Environmental Action Group
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.