Manmohan Singh, J. (Oral)

1. No one appears on behalf of defendants. For the last many dates they are not appearing and they have also failed to pay the costs. After imposing the costs they lost their interest and they did not participate in the proceedings.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has made his submissions on merit.

3. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against defendants, its members, agents, representatives, associates and servants.

4. The plaintiff is a renowned college of University of Delhi. Defendant No.1 is an organisation of non-teaching employees of University of Delhi of which defendant No. 2 is the general secretary and defendant No.3 is the president. Defendant No.3 is also an employee of the plaintiff.

5. It is the case for the plaintiff that defendants have been time to time holding loud demonstrations and agitation inside the premises of the plaintiff using microphones and loudspeakers which adversely affects the academic activities therein. These types of demonstrations and threatening language are becoming a regular feature of the defendants. While employees working co