Valmiki J. Mehta, J (Oral)

C.M. No.3801/2014 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RC. REV. No.386/2012 and C.M. Nos.3800/2014 (stay) & 13589/2012 (stay)

2. No doubt, this Court in routine receives various challenges to orders which are passed by the Additional Rent Controller, and number of them are frivolous, however, the present petition is a height of dishonesty and lack of bonafides of an unacceptable nature. This I am observing because the admitted fact is that the petitioner/tenant has not paid even nominal, the admitted rent @ Rs.60/- per month way back from the year 1979. Not only the nominal admitted rent is not paid, but, the facts discussed below will show that the petitioner/tenant is resorting to falsehood of denying the ownership of the respondent/landlord and who is the son of Sh. Vijay Narain although to Sh. Vijay Narain petitioner/tenant admits that he had paid the rent and hence Sh. Vijay Narain was the landlord of the petitioner. Therefore for around 35 years, petitioner is staying in the tenanted premises comprising of one room on the ground floor, without paying a single rupee as charges for use and o