S.RAVINDRA BHAT, NAJMI WAZIRI
HARISH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR – Respondent
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
C.M. NO.12543/2013 (for condonation of delay)
C.M. No.12543/2013 is allowed in the above terms.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned.
RFA (OS) 99/2013, C.M. NOS.12541/2013 (for stay), 12542/2013 (for filing addl. Documents) & 12545/2013 (seeking exemption from filing deficient Court Fees and extension of time in making up the deficient Court Fee)
1. This is a Regular First Appeal from an order of a learned Single Judge in CS(OS) 3001/2011, dismissing the suit for a failure to disclose any cause of action in the plaint.
2. Briefly, the plaintiff, Harish Sharma, seeks to impugn a registered General Power of Attorney signed by him in favour of the defendant, Raj Kumar. The plaint, alleged that the appellant purchased, and was in possession of, Property No. C-486-B, Gali No. 20, Bhajanpura, Delhi (hereinafter the “suit property”) through sale deed dated 8th February, 2007 for a sale consideration of Rs. 3,05,000/-from one Smt. Sosan Masih. The appellant argued that thereafter, on account of financial constraints in 2009, the defendant, who knew him previously, agreed to advance a loan of Rs. 13,00,000 to him at 2% interest, with rep
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.