SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 2462

S.P.GARG
Hindustan Pencils Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar Bajaj – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
For the Plaintiff:Sushant Singh, with P.C. Arya, Advocates.
For the Defendants: None.

Judgment

S.P. Garg, J.

1. M/s. Hindustan Pencils Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the plaintiff’) has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, delivery up, etc. against the defendants. The case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under :

2. The plaintiff earlier a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act has been converted into a private limited company. Mr.Manoj Dabke is the authorized signatory of the plaintiff to institute the present suit. It is further averred that the plaintiff is well established and is carrying on an old and established business of manufacturing, marketing and selling pencils, erasers, sharpeners, foot rulers and other items of stationery of day-to-day use since 1957. It has conceived, invented, designed and adopted the mark ‘NATARAJ’ along with a device of ‘NATARAJ’ in respect of their pencils, sharpeners, erasers and other stationery products in the year 1961 and since then, they have been using the said trademark ‘NATARAJ’ along with device of ‘NATARAJ’ in a particular design label having its colour scheme, get up, layout, background in r















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top