G.P.MITTAL
Yudhvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dharamvir – Respondent
G.P. Mittal, J.
IA No.9303/2013 (Order VI Rule 17 CPC) by Plaintiff
1. This suit for permanent injunction was filed by the Plaintiff initially against Defendants no.1 to 3 with the averments that the Plaintiff is absolute owner of property measuring 3157 sq. yds comprising Khasra no.263, Village Chattarpur, New Delhi which was purchased by the Plaintiff from one Yadram on the basis of various documents including Agreement to Sell and General Power of Attorney. Entire sale consideration having been paid to the earlier said Yadram, the physical possession of the suit property and also the original documents executed by one Bhagwat Singh in favour of Yadram was also handed over to the Plaintiff. Defendants no.1 and 2 are the sons of said Bhagwat Singh. It is the case of the Plaintiff that on 24.09.2008, it transpired that Defendant no.3 in conspiracy and at the behest of Defendants no.1 and 2 visited the suit property and wanted to grab the suit property. Again, an attempt was made by the Defendants on 28.09.2008 to take possession of the suit property forcibly.
2. By an order dated 01.10.2008, an ex parte interim injunction was granted in favour of the Plaintiff and against the
Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy & Ors.
Nisha Somaia v. Outlook Publishing (India) Ltd. & Ors.
B.K.N. Narayana Pillai v. P. Pillai & Anr.
Charan Das v. Amir Khan (AIR 1921 PC 50)
L.J. Leach and Co. Ltd. v. Jardine Skinner and Co. (AIR 1957 SC 357)
Sampath Kumar v. Ayyakannu & Anr.
J. Leach and Cop. Ltd. v Jardine Skinner and Co.
T.N. Alloy Foundry Co. Ltd. v. T.N. Electricity Board & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.