MANMOHAN SINGH
Krishna Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar Goel – Respondent
Manmohan Singh, J.
1. By this order I propose to decide application being I.A. No. 21109/ 2013 under Order 12 Rule 6 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff who has filed the suit for possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of the leased portion in the property bearing No. 32, F.I.E., Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi – 110092 (hereinafter referred to as the “suit property”).
2. The parties entered into a Lease Deed dated 24th October, 2008 in respect of the basement, ground floor and part of first floor of the suit property by virtue of which the defendants have been in possession, occupation and control thereof. The Lease Deed was executed for a period of three years for a monthly rent of Rs.1,47,000/-. The defendants have been using the leased portion of the suit property for services of two wheelers. The front portion alongwith toilet and complete second floor has been stated to be in possession of the plaintiff.
3. It is the case of the plaintiff that ever since the inception of the lease, the defendant has been using the leased portion of the suit property contrary to the terms of the lease deed. Defendants have b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.