SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 2085

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Chiraguddin – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Paritosh Budhiraja, Advocate.
For the Respondents:P.K. Rawal, Advocate.

Judgment

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed against the impugned judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 6.3.2012 which has dismissed the first appeal filed by the petitioner/appellant against the order of the trial court/Additional Rent Controller dated 21.5.2008 by which the trial court directed eviction of the petitioner/tenant in a petition filed under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) pertaining to non-payment of rent.

2. The issue in the present case is that whether a right created under Section 19 of the Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Slum Act’) can be waived and is deemed to be waived by the petitioner/tenant in the facts of the present case.

3. The facts of the case are that the respondent nos.1 to 5/landlords filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act, on the ground of non-payment of rent. This eviction petition was decreed by the first court/Additional Rent Controller by the judgment dated 12.3.2007. Since in law after decreeing a petition, it has to be examined whether petitioner/tena






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top