VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Chiraguddin – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Rani – Respondent
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed against the impugned judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 6.3.2012 which has dismissed the first appeal filed by the petitioner/appellant against the order of the trial court/Additional Rent Controller dated 21.5.2008 by which the trial court directed eviction of the petitioner/tenant in a petition filed under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) pertaining to non-payment of rent.
2. The issue in the present case is that whether a right created under Section 19 of the Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Slum Act’) can be waived and is deemed to be waived by the petitioner/tenant in the facts of the present case.
3. The facts of the case are that the respondent nos.1 to 5/landlords filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act, on the ground of non-payment of rent. This eviction petition was decreed by the first court/Additional Rent Controller by the judgment dated 12.3.2007. Since in law after decreeing a petition, it has to be examined whether petitioner/tena
Albein Plywood Ltd. & Another vs. Janak Kapur & Others
Martin and Harris Ltd. vs. VIth Additional District Judge and Others
Badri Prasad and Others vs. Seth Nagarmal
Surajmal Nargoremuil vs. Triton Insurance Company Ltd. (1925) LR 52 Ind App 126: AIR 1925 PC 83
Krishan Lal vs. State of J&K (1994) 4 SCC 422
Bhagchand Dagadusa vs. Secretary of State for India in Council
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.